Monday, April 26, 2010

Chapter 16

http://www.fraserinstitute.org/newsandevents/news/6426.aspx


Raising BC’s minimum wage could cost more than 52,000 jobs and reduce opportunities for young workers

Summary
This article is explaining, why BC shouldn't raise the minimum wage of $8 to $10. This would only result in the loss of many jobs; up to 52,000 jobs. In the study of the Economic Effects of Increasing BC’s Minimum Wage, it was found that the increasing of the minimum wage will result in the job loss from 10,898 to 52,200. For the past couple of years the unions has been trying to raise the minimum wage. Studies found that increasing in minimum wage will make it a huge disadvantage and it has a significant negative impact on employment for those who have a lower skill level and the young. In the past there was a 10% increase in the minimum wage across Canada, with this increase the employment decreased for young workers ages 15-24 by 3 to 6%. Since the raise in wage is so drastic, this event can result in 4.5-20% employment losses. There are also other negative to the raise in minimum wage; "fewer benefits and less training for workers. Higher minimum wages can also induce high school students to drop out of school and search for employment." There were statistics that found that there were 62,600 BC workers earning $8 per hour in 2007 and more than 56% of these were young workers ages from 14 to 24. Eighty seven percent of them lived at home with family. “Many of the remaining individuals earning minimum wages are adults supplementing their family income with part-time work during child-rearing years or after retirement." The increase of BC's minimum wage will only result the loss of jobs and opportunities and this will make life difficult for those with low income and those who live in poverty.


Connection
In chapter 16 we have learnt the benefits with becoming an employee. One of them is UI (EI) which is unemployment insurance ( employment insurance), this fund is provided from a portion of employed worker's pay into the large pool of money and the employer is suppose to match this amount of money. If the worker has worked for a long enough period of time and has contribute to this fund. If this worker is unemployed, they are entitled to receive payment out of the fund. Since UI is meant for unemployed workers, the raising of the minimum wage from $8 to $ 10 will only cause a large amount of lay-offs; this may cause the EI fund to run on low due to the huge amount of unemployed workers. With fewer workers contributing to this fund it also creates a problem. What will happen if they run out of the fund?



Reflection
In my opinion, if raising the minimum wage would only do more harm than good; we should just stick to $8 an hour for minimum wage. This article shows that increasing the minimum wage would lead to thousands of people to lose their jobs, especially in the young (between ages 15-24) and the citizens who have less skill. If raising the minimum wage will only cause a burden and a load for the citizen of Canada, why would anyone still consider about raising the wage? Raising the wage would only benefit a small amount of people, this will only cause unemployment rate to raise and the goal of having high standard of living for Canadian citizen would just be a joke. Having the minimum wage as it is provides more opportunities for the young workers to gain experience. I strongly believe that raising the minimum wage would only cause distrubtion and hardship.

Sunday, April 11, 2010

chapter 15

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=al4bzUS2.JWM

Madoff Auditor Under Investigation by New York State Prosecutor

SUMMARY

This article is about a famous investor Bernard L. Madoff’s auditor was charged in a $50 billion Ponzi scheme in New York’s Rockland County. On Dec. 11 Madoff was sued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Madoff told his employees that the firm was financially ruined. “‘We’re trying to determine if there have been any state crimes here,’ Rockland County District Attorney Thomas Zugibe said in a telephone interview today. ‘When you have a key player like that operating in your county, you have to look.’`` According to the annual financial statement on Dec. 18, 2006 that everything followed the accounting principles. ``The financial analysis said Madoff Securities had $1.3 billion in assets, including $711 million in marketable securities and $67 million in U.S. debt. Members’ equity, the firm’s net worth, was $604 million, according to the document. `` The auditor was described a man who comes in the office for 10 to 15 minutes and leaves. The man drives a Lexus and he doesn`t dress in business attire.

CONNECTION

In Chapter 15 I have learned use formulas for ratios and percentage to compare financial statements with different companies. I have use $711million in marketable securities assets divided by the $1.3 billion total asset, $67 million in U.S. debt. Members’ equity divided by the $1.3 billion total asset and Members’ equity, the firm’s net worth, was $604 million divided by the $1.3 billion total asset and multiplies it by 100% to show how much the assets are worth. The marketable securities assets are 54.6 % of the total asset, The U.S. debt. Members’ equity is 5.2% is of the total asset and the Members’ equity, the firm’s net worth is 46.5 % of the total asset. As you can see the big part of the assets is from marketable securities assets. Marketable securities assets are very liquid as they tend to have maturities of less than one year. In this section it has taught me to be able to compare, financial statements and to compare if a company is doing better. This can be done by using Current Ratio, Current Ratio, Current Ratio, and Current Ratio. I would want to use all these equations to compare the financial statements of Mad off’s firm, but unfortunately I was unable to find his financial statements.

REFLECTION

As I have learned that using ratios and percentages is very important to compare and to see what is going on in companies if you are an outsider investor or an insider. As an investor although even if you have compared and done a lot of research in companies you like to invest, I believe that you have to be careful in the companies you invest in. As you can see that Mad off’s firm was a large trusted company and the whole time they were lying about invest their customer`s money. No matter what, where or who you are investing your money in; the formula and equations can only help you so far. Just remember you can`t trust anyone, but yourself. So make the right decision by being a smart investor.

Thursday, April 8, 2010

Chapter 15

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=al4bzUS2.JWM

Madoff Auditor Under Investigation by New York State Prosecutor


SUMMARY

This article is about a famous investor Bernard L. Madoff’s auditor was charged in a $50 billion Ponzi scheme in New York’s Rockland County. On Dec. 11 Madoff was sued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Madoff told his employees that the firm was financially ruined. “‘We’re trying to determine if there have been any state crimes here,’ Rockland County District Attorney Thomas Zugibe said in a telephone interview today. ‘When you have a key player like that operating in your county, you have to look.’`` According to the annual financial statement on Dec. 18, 2006 that everything followed the accounting principles. ``The financial analysis said Madoff Securities had $1.3 billion in assets, including $711 million in marketable securities and $67 million in U.S. debt. Members’ equity, the firm’s net worth, was $604 million, according to the document. `` The auditor was described a man who comes in the office for 10 to 15 minutes and leaves. The man drives a Lexus and he doesn`t dress in business attire.



CONNECTON

In Chapter 15 I have learned use formulas for ratios and percentage to compare financial statements with different companies. I have use $711million in marketable securities assets divided by the $1.3 billion total asset, $67 million in U.S. debt. Members’ equity divided by the $1.3 billion total asset and Members’ equity, the firm’s net worth, was $604 million divided by the $1.3 billion total asset and multiplies it by 100% to show how much the assets are worth. The marketable securities assets are 54.6 % of the total asset, The U.S. debt. Members’ equity is 5.2% is of the total asset and the Members’ equity, the firm’s net worth is 46.5 % of the total asset. As you can see the big part of the assets is from marketable securities assets. Marketable securities assets are very liquid as they tend to have maturities of less than one year. In this section it has taught me to be able to compare, financial statements and to compare if a company is doing better. This can be done by using Current Ratio, Current Ratio, Current Ratio, and Current Ratio. I would want to use all these equations to compare the financial statements of Mad off’s firm, but unfortunately I was unable to find his financial statements.



REFLECTION

As I have learned that using ratios and percentages is very important to compare and to see what is going on in companies if you are an outsider investor or an insider. As an investor although even if you have compared and done a lot of research in companies you like to invest, I believe that you have to be careful in the companies you invest in. As you can see that Mad off’s firm was a large trusted company and the whole time they were lying about invest their customer`s money. No matter what, where or who you are investing your money in; the formula and equations can only help you so far. Just remember you can`t trust anyone, but yourself. So make the right decision by being a smart investor.